Goodstein v. Welsh Bros. Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goodstein v. Welsh Bros. Contracting Co.

248 A.D. 635

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 635 (Goodstein v. Welsh Bros. Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodstein v. Welsh Bros. Contracting Co., 248 A.D. 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendant Mesard’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against him, under rule 106, subdivision 5, of the Rules of Civil Practice, as being insufficient in law, affirmed, [636]*636with, ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (Lurie v. New Amsterdam, Casualty Co., 270 N. Y. 379.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant Mesard’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against him, under rule 106, subdivision 5, of the Rules of Civil Practice, as being insufficient in law, affirmed, [636]*636with, ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (Lurie v. New Amsterdam, Casualty Co., 270 N. Y. 379.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodstein-v-welsh-bros-contracting-co-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack