Goodstein v. Gary Fronrath Chevrolet, Inc.

458 So. 2d 869, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2393, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15925
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 14, 1984
DocketNos. 84-107, 84-356
StatusPublished

This text of 458 So. 2d 869 (Goodstein v. Gary Fronrath Chevrolet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodstein v. Gary Fronrath Chevrolet, Inc., 458 So. 2d 869, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2393, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15925 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was a collision between an automobile operated by William Cronin, Jr., and a bicycle ridden by nine-year-old Brian Good-stein. A negligence action ensued with comparative negligence being asserted as an affirmative defense.

[870]*870It appears that the accident happened in the daytime during a heavy rainfall. Good-stein was riding his bicycle on the sidewalk. His way was blocked by a parked car in a driveway whereupon Goodstein went around the parked ear and into the street and was struck by Cronin. There were trees in the swale between the sidewalk and the road.

The trial court directed a verdict in favor of Cronin (and the other defendants). We reverse and remand for a new trial.

The standards to be applied in directing a verdict are well known and do not need repeating. See Echols v. Hammet Company, Inc., 423 So.2d 923 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), pet. for rev. den., 434 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983); Tesher & Tesher v. Rothfield, 387 So.2d 499 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Here there were conflicts and inferences in the evidence such as whether Cronin applied his brakes soon enough, whether he was sufficiently observant, and whether he acted as a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances so as to preclude entry of a directed verdict. We reverse in order that a jury may make the determinations upon authority of Miami Paper Co. v. Johnston, 58 So.2d 869 (Fla.1952); McQueen v. Atlantic Truck Service, Inc., 215 So.2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968); Mathis v. Lambert, 274 So.2d 601 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); and Bilams ¶. Metropolitan Transit Authority, 371 So.2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

DOWNEY, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Echols v. Hammet Co., Inc.
423 So. 2d 923 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Mathis v. Lambert
274 So. 2d 601 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Tesher & Tesher v. Rothfield
387 So. 2d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Miami Paper Co. v. Johnston
58 So. 2d 869 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Bilams v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
371 So. 2d 693 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
McQueen v. Atlantic Truck Service, Inc.
215 So. 2d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 So. 2d 869, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2393, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodstein-v-gary-fronrath-chevrolet-inc-fladistctapp-1984.