Goodson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Goodson v. State

670 So. 2d 1151, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3304, 1996 WL 143614

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 1, 1996·No. No. 95-1007·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the record before us, we find no error and affirm. This affirmance, however, is without prejudice to appellant to file a properly sworn timely motion pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to challenge the amount of jail time credit he received against his sentence for violation of probation. See Jensen v. State, 449 So.2d 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

JOANOS, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, concur-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the record before us, we find no error and affirm. This affirmance, however, is without prejudice to appellant to file a properly sworn timely motion pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to challenge the amount of jail time credit he received against his sentence for violation of probation. See Jensen v. State, 449 So.2d 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

JOANOS, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, concur-

Goodson v. State, 670 So. 2d 1151, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3304, 1996 WL 143614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

670 So. 2d 1151 (Goodson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related