Goodson v. State

608 So. 2d 943, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229, 1992 WL 354629
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 1992
DocketNo. 92-185
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 608 So. 2d 943 (Goodson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodson v. State, 608 So. 2d 943, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229, 1992 WL 354629 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

Affirmed. As in Butler v. State, 608 So.2d 33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) we certify as being of great public importance the following question to our supreme court:

[944]*944WHETHER THE CHAPTER 89-280 AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 775.-084(1)(A)1, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRIOR TO THEIR REENACTMENT AS PART OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES, BECAUSE THEY WERE IN VIOLATION OF THE SINGLE SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION.

We note that the supreme court has accepted jurisdiction to answer this question. McCall v. State, 593 So.2d 1052 (Fla.1992).

AFFIRMED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.

COWART and DIAMANTES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodson v. State
620 So. 2d 1227 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Stahlberg v. State
616 So. 2d 58 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
608 So. 2d 943, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229, 1992 WL 354629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodson-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.