Goodson v. State

608 So. 2d 943, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229, 1992 WL 354629
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 4, 1992·No. No. 92-185·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

Affirmed. As in Butler v. State, 608 So.2d 33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) we certify as being of great public importance the following question to our supreme court:

[944]*944WHETHER THE CHAPTER 89-280 AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 775.-084(1)(A)1, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRIOR TO THEIR REENACTMENT AS PART OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES, BECAUSE THEY WERE IN VIOLATION OF THE SINGLE SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION.

We note that the supreme court has accepted jurisdiction to answer this question. McCall v. State, 593 So.2d 1052 (Fla.1992).

AFFIRMED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.

COWART and DIAMANTES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodson v. State, 608 So. 2d 943, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229, 1992 WL 354629 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

608 So. 2d 943 (Goodson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodson v. State
620 So. 2d 1227 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Stahlberg v. State
616 So. 2d 58 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)