Goodson v. Oliver

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Goodson v. Oliver

18 S.C.L. 446

DecidedJune 15, 1831

StatusPublished

This text of 18 S.C.L. 446 (Goodson v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodson v. Oliver, 18 S.C.L. 446 (S.C. Ct. App. 1831).

Pincite

Opinion

Harper, J.

The summary process is an equitable proceeding, and less strictness is required than when proceeding according to the forms of the common law. The process refers to the copy of the note indorsed on it; and may properly be said to make the copy a part of the process. In Equity, exhibits are part of the bill and answer. There was no variance between the copy and the note given in evidence; The motion for nonsuit is therefore refused.

Johnson, J. and O’Neall, J. concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harper, J.

The summary process is an equitable proceeding, and less strictness is required than when proceeding according to the forms of the common law. The process refers to the copy of the note indorsed on it; and may properly be said to make the copy a part of the process. In Equity, exhibits are part of the bill and answer. There was no variance between the copy and the note given in evidence; The motion for nonsuit is therefore refused.

Johnson, J. and O’Neall, J. concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 S.C.L. 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodson-v-oliver-scctapp-1831.