Goods v. Hairston

295 F. App'x 578
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 9, 2008·No. No. 07-7571·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Obbie L. Goods appeals the district court’s orders adopting reports and recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Goods’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goods v. Hairston, No. 1:01-cv-00026-NCT (M.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2002 & Sept. 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goods v. Hairston, 295 F. App'x 578 (4th Cir. 2008).

295 F. App'x 578 (Goods v. Hairston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related