Goodridge v. Federal Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goodridge v. Federal Insurance

91 A.D.2d 677, 457 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19552

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.2d 677 (Goodridge v. Federal Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodridge v. Federal Insurance, 91 A.D.2d 677, 457 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by plaintiff from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated July 24, 1981, as (1) denied his motion, inter alia, for a final order of preclusion and (2) directed defendants to pay him only $20 costs. Order modified by increasing the costs awarded plaintiff to $500. As so modified, order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. Defendants’ time to pay the costs is extended until 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. Under the circumstances of this case, the costs assessed by Special Term were insufficient. Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by plaintiff from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated July 24, 1981, as (1) denied his motion, inter alia, for a final order of preclusion and (2) directed defendants to pay him only $20 costs. Order modified by increasing the costs awarded plaintiff to $500. As so modified, order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. Defendants’ time to pay the costs is extended until 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. Under the circumstances of this case, the costs assessed by Special Term were insufficient. Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.2d 677, 457 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodridge-v-federal-insurance-nyappdiv-1982.