Goodrich v. Home Depot
771 N.W.2d 742, 485 Mich. 865
This text of 771 N.W.2d 742 (Goodrich v. Home Depot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goodrich v. Home Depot, 771 N.W.2d 742, 485 Mich. 865 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Chris GOODRICH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HOME DEPOT, Home Depot, Inc., and/or Home Depot USA, Inc., Richard Tindall, Mike Kinzell, a/k/a Mike Kinsal, Julia Peters, and Lindsey Magley, a/k/a Lindsay Magley, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
771 N.W.2d 742, 485 Mich. 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodrich-v-home-depot-mich-2009.