Goodrich v. Bray

158 P. 1199, 92 Wash. 700, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1291
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 21, 1916
DocketNo. 13135
StatusPublished

This text of 158 P. 1199 (Goodrich v. Bray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodrich v. Bray, 158 P. 1199, 92 Wash. 700, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1291 (Wash. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

During the oral argument of this appeal, counsel on both sides conceded an adjustment, since confirmed by written communications between them; so the cause is remanded with instructions to set aside the judgment heretofore rendered, reopen the case, and allow the plaintiff until the first day of October, 1916, in which to complete the performance of the obligations and conditions upon his part under the contract involved, the defendants to be relieved of intermediate maintenance fees during the present season; but upon satisfactory test of the completed work by plaintiff, to make full performance of all things remaining by them to be done. The lower court is fully reinvested with the cause for such new or supplemental hearings as may be necessary to carry into effect the extended situation. The costs of this court may be apportioned between the parties as the lower court on the conclusion of the controversy may see fit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 P. 1199, 92 Wash. 700, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodrich-v-bray-wash-1916.