Goodrich Silvertown, Inc. v. Rogers

200 S.E. 91, 189 S.C. 101, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 195
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 9, 1938·No. 14788·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

We think that the two questions presented by the appeal in this case, one having to do with the doctrine of accession and the other with the recording acts, were properly disposed of by the Circuit Judge, and we apjprove the result *108 of his decree. Under the admitted facts, the conclusion reached by him as to the first finds general support in the authorities, while his disposition of the second is clearly sustained by our own decisions, including Perkins v. Loan & Exchange Bank, 43 S. C., 39, 20 S. E., 759, relied on by the appellant.

The Circuit order, therefore, which will be reported, is affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and FishburnE concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodrich Silvertown, Inc. v. Rogers, 200 S.E. 91, 189 S.C. 101, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 195 (S.C. 1938).

200 S.E. 91 (Goodrich Silvertown, Inc. v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Sweet
300 S.E.2d 733 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1983)
Planters National Bank & Trust Co. v. South Carolina Insurance
138 S.E.2d 812 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
South Carolina National Bank v. Guest
102 S.E.2d 215 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1958)
Rabtoay General Tire Co. v. Colorado Kenworth Corp.
309 P.2d 616 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1957)
United States v. Anders Contracting Co.
111 F. Supp. 700 (W.D. South Carolina, 1953)