Goodrich Silvertown, Inc. v. Rogers

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Goodrich Silvertown, Inc. v. Rogers

200 S.E. 91, 189 S.C. 101, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 195

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedDecember 9, 1938

Docket14788

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 200 S.E. 91 (Goodrich Silvertown, Inc. v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodrich Silvertown, Inc. v. Rogers, 200 S.E. 91, 189 S.C. 101, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 195 (S.C. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

We think that the two questions presented by the appeal in this case, one having to do with the doctrine of accession and the other with the recording acts, were properly disposed of by the Circuit Judge, and we apjprove the result *108 of his decree. Under the admitted facts, the conclusion reached by him as to the first finds general support in the authorities, while his disposition of the second is clearly sustained by our own decisions, including Perkins v. Loan & Exchange Bank, 43 S. C., 39, 20 S. E., 759, relied on by the appellant.

The Circuit order, therefore, which will be reported, is affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and FishburnE concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

We think that the two questions presented by the appeal in this case, one having to do with the doctrine of accession and the other with the recording acts, were properly disposed of by the Circuit Judge, and we apjprove the result *108 of his decree. Under the admitted facts, the conclusion reached by him as to the first finds general support in the authorities, while his disposition of the second is clearly sustained by our own decisions, including Perkins v. Loan & Exchange Bank, 43 S. C., 39, 20 S. E., 759, relied on by the appellant.

The Circuit order, therefore, which will be reported, is affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and FishburnE concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 S.E. 91, 189 S.C. 101, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodrich-silvertown-inc-v-rogers-sc-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack