Home/Supreme Court/Goodno v. South Florida Farms Co.

Goodno v. South Florida Farms Co.

263 U.S. 684, 44 S. Ct. 180, 68 L. Ed. 505, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2834
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 1924
DocketNo. 256
StatusPublished

This text of 263 U.S. 684 (Goodno v. South Florida Farms Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodno v. South Florida Farms Co., 263 U.S. 684, 44 S. Ct. 180, 68 L. Ed. 505, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2834 (1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want pf jurisdiction upon the authority of Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 [685]*685U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419; Grays Harbor Co. v. Coats-Fordney Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19.

Mr. Daniel Thew Wright, Mr. W. Bussell Osborne and Mr. Philip Ershler, for defendant in error, in support of the motion. Mr. Benjamin Micou, for plaintiff in error, in opposition to the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission
226 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works
237 U.S. 413 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Fordney Logging Co.
243 U.S. 251 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Bruce v. Tobin
245 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 U.S. 684, 44 S. Ct. 180, 68 L. Ed. 505, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodno-v-south-florida-farms-co-scotus-1924.