Goodness v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Goodness v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

27 Misc. 11, 57 N.Y.S. 100

DecidedMarch 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Misc. 11 (Goodness v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodness v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 27 Misc. 11, 57 N.Y.S. 100 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Gaynor, J.:

The court should not be bothered with a motion like this except upon proof that a request has been made to the, attorney for the Opposite side for the information and refused. In this case the order to show cause seems to have, been obtained only as a subterfuge to get an extension of time to answer.

The motion is denied, with' $10 costs and the extension of time to answer is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaynor, J.:

The court should not be bothered with a motion like this except upon proof that a request has been made to the, attorney for the Opposite side for the information and refused. In this case the order to show cause seems to have, been obtained only as a subterfuge to get an extension of time to answer.

The motion is denied, with' $10 costs and the extension of time to answer is vacated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Misc. 11, 57 N.Y.S. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodness-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nysupct-1899.