Goodman v. W. W. Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goodman v. W. W. Construction Co.

263 A.D. 879, 32 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7187

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 879 (Goodman v. W. W. Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodman v. W. W. Construction Co., 263 A.D. 879, 32 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Two consolidated actions. In Action No. 2, to recover on an assignment of a painting subcontractor’s claim against the general building contractor, order granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out answer of defendant W. W. Construction Co., Inc., and for summary judgment, order granting reargument and on reargument modifying the aforesaid order, and judgment entered thereon reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. In addition to the question of the validity of the assignment there are questions of fact to be tried, particularly that as to the ownership of the same fund. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Two consolidated actions. In Action No. 2, to recover on an assignment of a painting subcontractor’s claim against the general building contractor, order granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out answer of defendant W. W. Construction Co., Inc., and for summary judgment, order granting reargument and on reargument modifying the aforesaid order, and judgment entered thereon reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. In addition to the question of the validity of the assignment there are questions of fact to be tried, particularly that as to the ownership of the same fund. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 879, 32 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-w-w-construction-co-nyappdiv-1942.