Goodman v. United States

398 F.2d 879
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 28, 1968·No. Nos. 21982, 21982-A·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We agree that the complaint was inadequate and that the court’s findings were less complete than they should have been. It is also true that the evidence was far from one sided, particularly with regard to the claim of appellee Rineer. However, it does not appear that appellants were surprised or otherwise prejudiced by any deficiency in the pleadings; we are satisfied that the findings, including those necessarily implied, are sufficient to support the judgments; and we cannot say that these findings are clearly erroneous. Errors or defects in the proceedings which did not affect the substantial rights of the parties must be disregarded. Rule 61, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The judgments are therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodman v. United States, 398 F.2d 879 (9th Cir. 1968).

398 F.2d 879 (Goodman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related