Goodman v. Stolle

571 F. App'x 257
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2014·No. No. 14-6278·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Graham Goodman seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. The district court has subsequently ordered that its dismissal order will be vacated, and the case will go forward. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order that Goodman seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodman v. Stolle, 571 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2014).

571 F. App'x 257 (Goodman v. Stolle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

David Goodman v. Z. Diggs
986 F.3d 493 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)