Goodman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Goodman v. State

177 S.W. 968

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 9, 1915

DocketNo. 3592

StatusPublished

This text of 177 S.W. 968 (Goodman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodman v. State, 177 S.W. 968 (Tex. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of robbery with firearms, and his punishment assessed at 99 years in the penitentiary. The indictment was good, and followed the statute and approved form. Green v. State, 147 S. W. 593; Bell v. State, 177 S. W. 966, recently decided. There is no statement of facts nor bills of exceptions that can be considered in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of robbery with firearms, and his punishment assessed at 99 years in the penitentiary. The indictment was good, and followed the statute and approved form. Green v. State, 147 S. W. 593; Bell v. State, 177 S. W. 966, recently decided. There is no statement of facts nor bills of exceptions that can be considered in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 S.W. 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-state-texcrimapp-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack