Goodman v. State

177 S.W. 966, 77 Tex. Crim. 146, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 29
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 9, 1915·No. No. 3592.·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of . robbery with firearms and his punishment assessed at ninety-nine years in the penitentiary.

The indictment was good and followed the statute and approved form. Green v. State, 66 Texas Crim. Rep., 446, 147 S. W. Rep., 593; Bell v. State, 176 S. W. Rep., recently decided.

There is no statement of facts, nor bills of exception that can be considered in the absence of a statement of facts. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodman v. State, 177 S.W. 966, 77 Tex. Crim. 146, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 29 (Tex. 1915).

177 S.W. 966 (Goodman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. State
147 S.W. 593 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)