Goodman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Goodman v. State

256 So. 2d 245

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 4, 1972·No. Nos. 71-166, 71-167·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These appeals, consolidated for appellate purposes, are from an order denying each defendant’s motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Rule 3.850 CrPR, 33 F.S. A., following an evidentiary hearing by the trial court.

From our consideration of appellant’s motion, the entire record on appeal, briefs and argument of counsel, we have reached the conclusion that there was no basis upon which the trial judge should have granted the motion, therefore, his action in denying the motion was proper. No reversible error having been demonstrated the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These appeals, consolidated for appellate purposes, are from an order denying each defendant’s motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Rule 3.850 CrPR, 33 F.S. A., following an evidentiary hearing by the trial court.

From our consideration of appellant’s motion, the entire record on appeal, briefs and argument of counsel, we have reached the conclusion that there was no basis upon which the trial judge should have granted the motion, therefore, his action in denying the motion was proper. No reversible error having been demonstrated the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Goodman v. State, 256 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

256 So. 2d 245 (Goodman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.