Goodman v. State ex rel. Buono

243 So. 2d 594, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3138
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 20, 1971·No. No. 39686·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, State ex rel. Buono v. Goodman, 233 So.2d 185 (3rd D.C.A. Fla.1970), which allegedly conflicts with the decision rendered by this Court in Kelly v. State, 54 So.2d 431 (Fla.1951), and by the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, in Gossett v. Hanlon, 195 So.2d 865 (4th D.C.A. Fla.1967).

We have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits. On further consideration of the record and the briefs, we find the alleged conflict is dispelled. The writ being improvidently issued, it must now be discharged.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., DREW (Retired), J., and LEAVENGOOD, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodman v. State ex rel. Buono, 243 So. 2d 594, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3138 (Fla. 1971).

243 So. 2d 594 (Goodman v. State ex rel. Buono) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Soodhalter v. Baker
248 So. 2d 468 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)