Goodman v. State
41 Ark. 228
Opinion
OPINION.
There was nothing in the motion, and it was properly overruled. This court has repeatedly held that an indictment for gaming at cards need not allege the names of the persons who played the game, and there is no reason why it should allege the grand jurors’ ignorance of their names when they are not known. Orr v. The State, 18 Ark., 540; Medlock v. The State, Id., 363; State v. Parnell, 16 Ark., 506.
Affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goodman v. State, 41 Ark. 228 (Ark. 1883).
41 Ark. 228 (Goodman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Rood
380 P.2d 806 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1963)
State v. Light
21 P. 132 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1889)