Goodman v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Goodman v. Smith

120 F. App'x 452

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Goodman v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 F. App'x 36 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2005·No. 04-6820·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Steven Wayne Goodman appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants and denying Goodman’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f) motion for a *453 discovery continuance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goodman v. Smith, No. CA-00-986-7 (W.D.Va. filed Mar. 26, 2004 & entered Mar. 29, 2004). We grant Goodman’s motion to exceed the page limitation and deny his motions to remand, for consolidation, and for an informal briefing schedule. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Steven Wayne Goodman appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants and denying Goodman’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f) motion for a *453 discovery continuance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goodman v. Smith, No. CA-00-986-7 (W.D.Va. filed Mar. 26, 2004 & entered Mar. 29, 2004). We grant Goodman’s motion to exceed the page limitation and deny his motions to remand, for consolidation, and for an informal briefing schedule. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Goodman v. Smith, 120 F. App'x 452 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

120 F. App'x 452 (Goodman v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.