Goodman v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc.

233 S.E.2d 802, 141 Ga. App. 525, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1975
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 1, 1977·No. 53270·Published

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

The evidence in the present case was sufficient to make a jury issue as to whether the doctor, who treated and advised the complainant in the emergency room of the hospital to her alleged injury, was an employee or agent of the hospital (Executive Committee of the Baptist [526]*526Convention v. Ferguson, 95 Ga. App. 393 (4) (98 SE2d 50); s.c. 213 Ga. 441, 444 (99 SE2d 150)), and the trial court erred in excluding conversations between the complainant and the doctor, and between complainant’s son and the doctor relating to complainant’s condition.

Argued January 18, 1977 Decided February 1, 1977 Rehearing denied March 9, 1977 E. Graydon Shuford, for appellant. Hunter S. Allen, Jr., Thomas Marvin Smith, Jr., Robert G. Tanner, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Bell, C. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodman v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc., 233 S.E.2d 802, 141 Ga. App. 525, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1975 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

233 S.E.2d 802 (Goodman v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Executive Committee of the Baptist Convention v. Ferguson
98 S.E.2d 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Executive Committee of Baptist Convention v. Ferguson
99 S.E.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)