Goodman v. Meyer

177 S.E. 788, 180 Ga. 143, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 199
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 19, 1935
DocketNo. 10301
StatusPublished

This text of 177 S.E. 788 (Goodman v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodman v. Meyer, 177 S.E. 788, 180 Ga. 143, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 199 (Ga. 1935).

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

The court properly ruled that the plaintiffs can not maintain the present suit while a suit between the [147]*147same parties is pending in the municipal court, based on an alleged settlement of a prior suit in the superior court, which the plaintiffs dismissed at the time of and in consideration of said settlement. No cause of action is set forth in this present petition which was not fully set forth and relied upon in the original suit. No equitable rights are set forth by plaintiffs here which can not be set up by way of defense to the counter-claim in the suit pending in the municipal court. See Clower v. Bryan, 175 Ga. 790 (166 S. E. 194); First National Bank of Carrollton v. Roberts, 175 Ga. 810 (166 S. E. 211).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clower v. Bryan
166 S.E. 194 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
First National Bank v. Roberts
166 S.E. 211 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 S.E. 788, 180 Ga. 143, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-meyer-ga-1935.