Goodman v. Metropolitan Dade County Unsafe Structures Board

480 So. 2d 217, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 68, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17390
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 24, 1985·No. No. 85-1887·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review by certiorari of a Dade County Unsafe Structures Board order which directs the demolition of a building unless extensive repairs are substantially completed within 180 days. We grant review and quash that part of the order which imposes a 180-day time limit.

Petitioner contends that, considering the magnitude of work required to satisfy the Board’s requirements, the allotted time is unreasonable. We agree that there is no evidentiary support for the 180-day time limitation.

On remand the Board must first hear competent testimony as to what is a reasonable time period for the substantial commencement and completion of repairs and then fix dates for compliance. In the meantime the Board may impose other conditions which insure public safety while the repairs are ongoing. See Edco Enterprises, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County Unsafe Structures Board, 458 So.2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); section 202.10(b), South Florida Building Code (1984).

Certiorari granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodman v. Metropolitan Dade County Unsafe Structures Board, 480 So. 2d 217, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 68, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17390 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

480 So. 2d 217 (Goodman v. Metropolitan Dade County Unsafe Structures Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tower Hotel, LLC v. City of Miami
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024