Goodman v. Goodman

224 S.W. 207, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 853
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 10, 1920
DocketNo. 2294.
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 224 S.W. 207 (Goodman v. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodman v. Goodman, 224 S.W. 207, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 853 (Tex. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

LEVY, J.

After hearing an application for a writ of habeas corpus, the court granted an order, which is appealed from, reading:

“It is therefore the order of the court that the plaintiff, Mrs. Ora Goodman, do have the care and custody of said two minor children, Austin Goodman and Gladys Goodman, during the pendency of this suit for divorce, and until a final hearing of this cause, or until the further orders of this court.”

The application for the writ alleged that a suit for divorce between Mrs. Goodman and her husband, wherein the custody of the' minor children was involved,-was then pending for a trial in the district court of Bowie county. The court is authorized to make temporary orders, as the above order was, pending any suit for divorce. Articles 4639 and 4641, Vernon’s Sayles’ Civil Statutes. But an appeal does not lie from the above order, because it is merely an interlocutory order, and temporary in its nature, and the statute does not provide for an appeal from a temporary order of this kind.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Craft v. Craft
579 S.W.2d 506 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Carpenter v. Ross
534 S.W.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Stephenson v. State
515 S.W.2d 362 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Gani v. Gani
475 S.W.2d 810 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Frost v. Frost
467 S.W.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Page v. Page
468 S.W.2d 489 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Hyde v. Hyde
406 S.W.2d 225 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Ex parte Franklin
393 S.W.2d 632 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Affolter v. Affolter
389 S.W.2d 742 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Mendoza v. Baker
319 S.W.2d 147 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1958)
Morrow v. Gallant
312 S.W.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1958)
Wardlaw v. Wardlaw
267 S.W.2d 250 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Mecke v. Grubbs
278 S.W.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 S.W. 207, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-goodman-texapp-1920.