Goodman v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goodman v. Goodman

12 A.D.2d 591, 208 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6643

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 A.D.2d 591 (Goodman v. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodman v. Goodman, 12 A.D.2d 591, 208 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6643 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on August 4, 1960, denying motion to modify a judgment of divorce by increasing the alimony therein awarded to plaintiff wife reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion granted to the extent of increasing permanent alimony from $3,5 per week to $50 per week, with $20 costs and disbursements of the appeal to plaintiff-appellant. While it may be true that defendant’s financial circumstances have not changed since the entry of the judgment in 1959, it is not substantially contradicted that the plaintiff’s circumstances have changed, both physically and financially. Consequently, the modest increase allowed is indicated. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on August 4, 1960, denying motion to modify a judgment of divorce by increasing the alimony therein awarded to plaintiff wife reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion granted to the extent of increasing permanent alimony from $3,5 per week to $50 per week, with $20 costs and disbursements of the appeal to plaintiff-appellant. While it may be true that defendant’s financial circumstances have not changed since the entry of the judgment in 1959, it is not substantially contradicted that the plaintiff’s circumstances have changed, both physically and financially. Consequently, the modest increase allowed is indicated. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 591, 208 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-goodman-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack