Goodman v. Eggers

172 A. 566, 113 N.J.L. 33, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 330
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 4, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 172 A. 566 (Goodman v. Eggers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodman v. Eggers, 172 A. 566, 113 N.J.L. 33, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 330 (N.J. 1934).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Hehee, Yan Buskirk, Heteield, Dear, Dill, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Parker, Lloyd, Perskie, Kays, Wells, JJ. 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A. 566, 113 N.J.L. 33, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-eggers-nj-1934.