Goodman v. Dominguez

California Court of Appeal

Goodman v. Dominguez

122 Cal. App. 784

California Court of Appeal·Decided April 19, 1932·No. Civ. No. 8373·Published

Opinion

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

This case involves the identical questions raised and passed upon in Rutledge v. Dominguez, City Clerk, etc., (Civil No. 8375), ante, p. 680 [10 Pac. (2d) 1027], and for the reasons stated in the opinion rendered this day therein, the order has been made denying the peremptory writ of mandate with the reservation that this opinion would be later filed.

Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

This case involves the identical questions raised and passed upon in Rutledge v. Dominguez, City Clerk, etc., (Civil No. 8375), ante, p. 680 [10 Pac. (2d) 1027], and for the reasons stated in the opinion rendered this day therein, the order has been made denying the peremptory writ of mandate with the reservation that this opinion would be later filed.

Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.

Goodman v. Dominguez, 122 Cal. App. 784 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

122 Cal. App. 784 (Goodman v. Dominguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related