Goodman v. Dominguez

California Court of Appeal

Goodman v. Dominguez

122 Cal. App. 784

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 19, 1932

DocketCiv. No. 8373

StatusPublished

This text of 122 Cal. App. 784 (Goodman v. Dominguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodman v. Dominguez, 122 Cal. App. 784 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

This case involves the identical questions raised and passed upon in Rutledge v. Dominguez, City Clerk, etc., (Civil No. 8375), ante, p. 680 [10 Pac. (2d) 1027], and for the reasons stated in the opinion rendered this day therein, the order has been made denying the peremptory writ of mandate with the reservation that this opinion would be later filed.

Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

This case involves the identical questions raised and passed upon in Rutledge v. Dominguez, City Clerk, etc., (Civil No. 8375), ante, p. 680 [10 Pac. (2d) 1027], and for the reasons stated in the opinion rendered this day therein, the order has been made denying the peremptory writ of mandate with the reservation that this opinion would be later filed.

Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 Cal. App. 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-dominguez-calctapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack