Goodman v. DAHRINGER

Michigan Supreme Court

Goodman v. DAHRINGER

745 N.W.2d 775, 480 Mich. 1118

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 21, 2008

Docket134696

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 745 N.W.2d 775 (Goodman v. DAHRINGER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodman v. DAHRINGER, 745 N.W.2d 775, 480 Mich. 1118 (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

745 N.W.2d 775 (2008)

Richard M. GOODMAN and Goodman, Lister & Peters, P.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Marjorie J. DAHRINGER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas Koster, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 134696. COA No. 273680.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 21, 2008.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to provide an explanation, to be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 42 days of the date of this order, of why it has jurisdiction *776 over this case, given its procedural history.

We retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

745 N.W.2d 775 (2008)

Richard M. GOODMAN and Goodman, Lister & Peters, P.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Marjorie J. DAHRINGER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas Koster, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 134696. COA No. 273680.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 21, 2008.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to provide an explanation, to be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 42 days of the date of this order, of why it has jurisdiction *776 over this case, given its procedural history.

We retain jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

745 N.W.2d 775, 480 Mich. 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-dahringer-mich-2008.

Opinion

Richard M. GOODMAN and Goodman, Lister & Peters, P.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Marjorie J. DAHRINGER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas Koster, Defendant-Appellee.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Richard M. GOODMAN and Goodman, Lister & Peters, P.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Marjorie J. DAHRINGER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas Koster, Defendant-Appellee.