Goodman v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Goodman v. Commonwealth

301 S.W.2d 2

DecidedFebruary 15, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 301 S.W.2d 2 (Goodman v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodman v. Commonwealth, 301 S.W.2d 2 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Tom Goodman, was convicted of malfeasance in office, fined $100, and his office of constable automatically forfeited under KRS 61.170(1).

We have considered each of the points raised by the appellant and conclude, after a discussion of them, that no substantial or prejudicial error was committed on the trial.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Tom Goodman, was convicted of malfeasance in office, fined $100, and his office of constable automatically forfeited under KRS 61.170(1).

We have considered each of the points raised by the appellant and conclude, after a discussion of them, that no substantial or prejudicial error was committed on the trial.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 S.W.2d 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack