Goodman v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Goodman v. Commonwealth

301 S.W.2d 2

Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided February 15, 1957·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Tom Goodman, was convicted of malfeasance in office, fined $100, and his office of constable automatically forfeited under KRS 61.170(1).

We have considered each of the points raised by the appellant and conclude, after a discussion of them, that no substantial or prejudicial error was committed on the trial.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Tom Goodman, was convicted of malfeasance in office, fined $100, and his office of constable automatically forfeited under KRS 61.170(1).

We have considered each of the points raised by the appellant and conclude, after a discussion of them, that no substantial or prejudicial error was committed on the trial.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Goodman v. Commonwealth, 301 S.W.2d 2 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

301 S.W.2d 2 (Goodman v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related