Goodman v. . Commissioners of Person

145 S.E. 923, 196 N.C. 257, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 338
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 14, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.E. 923 (Goodman v. . Commissioners of Person) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodman v. . Commissioners of Person, 145 S.E. 923, 196 N.C. 257, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 338 (N.C. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The bonds in question are issued in accordance with the provisions of the County Finance Act and in conformity with the provisions thereof. The findings of fact made by the trial judge and supported by evidence fully support and justify the judgment approving both bond issues. No practical purpose would be served by citation and discussion of authorities. The law is clear and well settled. Hartsfield v. Craven County, 194 N. C., 358, 139 S. E., 698; Hall v. Commissioners, 194 N. C., 768, 140 S. E., 739; Mayo v. Commissioners, ante, 15; Commissioners v. Spitzer, 173 N. C., 147, 91 S. E., 707.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Commissioners v. Sidney Spitzer & Co.
91 S.E. 707 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
Hartsfield v. . Craven County
139 S.E. 698 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Hall v. Commissioners of Duplin County
140 S.E. 739 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 S.E. 923, 196 N.C. 257, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-commissioners-of-person-nc-1928.