Goodman v. . Commissioners of Person

145 S.E. 923, 196 N.C. 257, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 338
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 14, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The bonds in question are issued in accordance with the provisions of the County Finance Act and in conformity with the provisions thereof. The findings of fact made by the trial judge and supported by evidence fully support and justify the judgment approving both bond issues. No practical purpose would be served by citation and discussion of authorities. The law is clear and well settled. Hartsfield v. Craven County, 194 N. C., 358, 139 S. E., 698; Hall v. Commissioners, 194 N. C., 768, 140 S. E., 739; Mayo v. Commissioners, ante, 15; Commissioners v. Spitzer, 173 N. C., 147, 91 S. E., 707.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodman v. . Commissioners of Person, 145 S.E. 923, 196 N.C. 257, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 338 (N.C. 1928).

145 S.E. 923 (Goodman v. . Commissioners of Person) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of Commissioners v. Sidney Spitzer & Co.
91 S.E. 707 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
Hartsfield v. . Craven County
139 S.E. 698 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Hall v. Commissioners of Duplin County
140 S.E. 739 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)