Goodman v. Boehme

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Goodman v. Boehme

197 A. 312, 123 N.J. Eq. 230, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 649

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided January 26, 1938·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree dismissing the bill of complaint will be affirmed. The complainant having chosen his remedy in a court of law after judgment is bound by his election. G. O. K. Enterprises, Inc., v. Moos, 116 N. J. Eq. 175.

For affirmance — Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, PerSkie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree dismissing the bill of complaint will be affirmed. The complainant having chosen his remedy in a court of law after judgment is bound by his election. G. O. K. Enterprises, Inc., v. Moos, 116 N. J. Eq. 175.

For affirmance — Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, PerSkie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Done.

Goodman v. Boehme, 197 A. 312, 123 N.J. Eq. 230, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 649 (N.J. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

197 A. 312 (Goodman v. Boehme) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.