Goodman v. Boehme

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Goodman v. Boehme

197 A. 312, 123 N.J. Eq. 230, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 649

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedJanuary 26, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 197 A. 312 (Goodman v. Boehme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodman v. Boehme, 197 A. 312, 123 N.J. Eq. 230, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 649 (N.J. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree dismissing the bill of complaint will be affirmed. The complainant having chosen his remedy in a court of law after judgment is bound by his election. G. O. K. Enterprises, Inc., v. Moos, 116 N. J. Eq. 175.

For affirmance — Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, PerSkie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree dismissing the bill of complaint will be affirmed. The complainant having chosen his remedy in a court of law after judgment is bound by his election. G. O. K. Enterprises, Inc., v. Moos, 116 N. J. Eq. 175.

For affirmance — Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, PerSkie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Done.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A. 312, 123 N.J. Eq. 230, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-boehme-njsuperctappdiv-1938.