Goodman v. BFI of Florida, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Goodman v. BFI of Florida, Inc.

755 So. 2d 191, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4232, 2000 WL 369845

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 12, 2000

DocketNo. 1D99-527

StatusPublished

This text of 755 So. 2d 191 (Goodman v. BFI of Florida, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodman v. BFI of Florida, Inc., 755 So. 2d 191, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4232, 2000 WL 369845 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Eddie Goodman, appeals an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) denying the compensability of his psychiatric injury based upon Claims Management, Inc. v. Drewno, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2351 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct.12,1998). Because the court did not have the benefit of our subsequent clarification in Claims Management, Inc. v. Drewno, 727 So.2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (on reh’g), we reverse and remand for further consideration.

Goodman suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which arose following his involvement in a ghastly traffic accident resulting in another person’s death on August 11, 1997, for which he was not at fault. During the accident, Goodman also received a minor shoulder injury, which, according to his attending physician, Dr. Steven Machlin, played only a small role in causing his PTSD. Under section 440.02(1), Florida Statutes (1997), a psychological injury due to “stress, fright, or excitement only” is not compensable. See, e.g., City of Holmes Beach v. Grace, 598 So.2d 71 (Fla.1992); Thames v. Santa Rosa County Jail, 639 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); City of Miami Beach v. Morantes, 633 So.2d 491 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We direct the JCC to determine on remand whether Goodman’s PTSD resulted from stress, fright, or excitement only, or whether it was increased or prolonged in any manner as a result of the shoulder injury. To establish the latter, Goodman was required to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the PTSD was a manifestation of his shoulder injury. § 440.09(1), Fla. Stat. (1997).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Eddie Goodman, appeals an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) denying the compensability of his psychiatric injury based upon Claims Management, Inc. v. Drewno, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2351 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct.12,1998). Because the court did not have the benefit of our subsequent clarification in Claims Management, Inc. v. Drewno, 727 So.2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (on reh’g), we reverse and remand for further consideration.

Goodman suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which arose following his involvement in a ghastly traffic accident resulting in another person’s death on August 11, 1997, for which he was not at fault. During the accident, Goodman also received a minor shoulder injury, which, according to his attending physician, Dr. Steven Machlin, played only a small role in causing his PTSD. Under section 440.02(1), Florida Statutes (1997), a psychological injury due to “stress, fright, or excitement only” is not compensable. See, e.g., City of Holmes Beach v. Grace, 598 So.2d 71 (Fla.1992); Thames v. Santa Rosa County Jail, 639 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); City of Miami Beach v. Morantes, 633 So.2d 491 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We direct the JCC to determine on remand whether Goodman’s PTSD resulted from stress, fright, or excitement only, or whether it was increased or prolonged in any manner as a result of the shoulder injury. To establish the latter, Goodman was required to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the PTSD was a manifestation of his shoulder injury. § 440.09(1), Fla. Stat. (1997).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

755 So. 2d 191, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4232, 2000 WL 369845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-bfi-of-florida-inc-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack