Goodman v. Beecham

114 S.E.2d 381, 101 Ga. App. 251, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 845
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 17, 1960·No. 38088·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Carlisle, Judge.

This case on its facts is not substantially different from the case of Conway v. Gower, 208 Ga. 348 (66 S. E. 2d 740), and the rulings made in that case are controlling on the issues presented by the assignment of error on the judgment, or order, vacating and setting aside the final judgment in this case. It follows that, since the motion to vacate and set aside the judgment did not show a meritorious reason for setting it aside, the trial court erred in entering the. judgment vacating and setting it aside.

Judgment reversed.

Gardner, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodman v. Beecham, 114 S.E.2d 381, 101 Ga. App. 251, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 845 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960).

114 S.E.2d 381 (Goodman v. Beecham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. Maryland Casualty Co.
116 S.E.2d 620 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)