Goodlett v. State

131 S.E. 113, 34 Ga. App. 682, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 485
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1925
Docket16835
StatusPublished

This text of 131 S.E. 113 (Goodlett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodlett v. State, 131 S.E. 113, 34 Ga. App. 682, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 485 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The sole assignment of error is that the conviction of the accused was not authorized by the evidence. The evidence amply authorized, indeed if it did not demand, the conviction. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.E. 113, 34 Ga. App. 682, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodlett-v-state-gactapp-1925.