Goodlett v. Ohio Cas. Group

Ohio Supreme Court

Goodlett v. Ohio Cas. Group

786 N.E.2d 59, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1508

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 2, 2003

Docket2003-0116

StatusPublished

This text of 786 N.E.2d 59 (Goodlett v. Ohio Cas. Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodlett v. Ohio Cas. Group, 786 N.E.2d 59, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1508 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA2002-04-090. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Entry Granting Motion to Certify Conflict filed January 10, 2003:

“Where both a person and a corporation are named insureds in a commercial automobile liability policy, is there still ambiguity in the word ‘you’ as found by the Ohio Supreme Court in Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 85 Ohio St.3d 660,1999-Ohio-292, with regard to the definition of Vho is an insured?’ ”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2003-0038, Goodlett v. Ohio Cas. Group, Butler App. No. CA2002-04-090.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler App. No. CA2002-04-090. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Entry Granting Motion to Certify Conflict filed January 10, 2003:

“Where both a person and a corporation are named insureds in a commercial automobile liability policy, is there still ambiguity in the word ‘you’ as found by the Ohio Supreme Court in Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 85 Ohio St.3d 660,1999-Ohio-292, with regard to the definition of Vho is an insured?’ ”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2003-0038, Goodlett v. Ohio Cas. Group, Butler App. No. CA2002-04-090.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

786 N.E.2d 59, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodlett-v-ohio-cas-group-ohio-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack