Goodin v. Van Haaften

90 N.W. 23, 130 Mich. 386, 1902 Mich. LEXIS 795
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 22, 1902·No. Docket No. 7·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). The court was in error. The general appearance and notice of trial operated as a waiver of the failure to file the bond and affidavit, within the time required by the statute, and gave the circuit court jurisdiction of the case. McCombs v. Johnson, 47 Mich. 593 (11 N. W. 400); Hamilton v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 53 Mich. 409 (18 N. W. 193); Sherwood v. Ionia Circuit Judge, 107 Mich. 136 (64 N. W. 1045).

Judgment reversed.

Hooker, C. J., Moore and Montgomery, JJ., concurred. Long, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodin v. Van Haaften, 90 N.W. 23, 130 Mich. 386, 1902 Mich. LEXIS 795 (Mich. 1902).

90 N.W. 23 (Goodin v. Van Haaften) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gotfredson Land Co. v. Shevitz
230 N.W. 900 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1930)
Dunn's Estate v. Wayne Circuit Judge
222 N.W. 194 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1928)
Beaudry v. Burroughs Adding MacHine Co.
214 N.W. 401 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1927)