Goodin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Goodin v. State

531 S.W.3d 106

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 24, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104939

StatusPublished

This text of 531 S.W.3d 106 (Goodin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodin v. State, 531 S.W.3d 106 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Daniel Goodin (“Movant") appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant pleaded guilty to the class B felony of first-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.160 (RSMo. 2000). Movant was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. We affirm the motion court’s judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been 'furnished with a memorandum for their’ information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Daniel Goodin (“Movant") appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant pleaded guilty to the class B felony of first-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.160 (RSMo. 2000). Movant was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. We affirm the motion court’s judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been 'furnished with a memorandum for their’ information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

531 S.W.3d 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodin-v-state-moctapp-2017.