Goodhue v. Rice
This text of 53 Cal. 302 (Goodhue v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The point urged by appellant could only have been properly presented to this Court by a bill of exceptions. The adjudication of defendant’s bankruptcy was not an issuable fact to be submitted to the jury, or to be determined by the findings—a jury being waived.
The application of a defendant for a stay of further proceedings in the action, on the ground that he has been adjudged a bankrupt, is a motion, and the evidence given by him in the District Court of the State in support of this motion can be considered here only when_ contained in a bill of exceptions duly settled and certified by the Judge of the Court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 Cal. 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodhue-v-rice-cal-1878.