Goodholm & Sparrow Inv. Co. v. Western Paving Co.

1915 OK 391, 150 P. 110, 48 Okla. 42, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 580
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 1, 1915·No. 4443·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This cause is similar in character and raises the same questions as No. 4442, Goodholm & Sparrow Investment Co. v. Trinidad-Cleveland Paving Co. et al., ante, 150 Pac. 109, and the law of that case controls this.

For the reasons given in the opinion filed in No. 4442, we recommend that the judgment appealed ' from be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodholm & Sparrow Inv. Co. v. Western Paving Co., 1915 OK 391, 150 P. 110, 48 Okla. 42, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 580 (Okla. 1915).

1915 OK 391 (Goodholm & Sparrow Inv. Co. v. Western Paving Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Enid ex rel. Versluis v. Robinson
39 F. Supp. 923 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1941)