Gooden v. State
This text of 410 S.E.2d 113 (Gooden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Earnest J. Gooden was convicted of the malice murder of Minnie M. Jeffery and sentenced to life imprisonment.1
The defendant and victim had been involved in a tempestuous relationship for several years. The defendant was also intimately involved with Agnes Watkins. On July 22, 1990, the defendant was driving Watkins’ car. He testified that he encountered a police roadblock, removed the gun Watkins kept under the front seat of the car, and placed it on the seat so that there would be no trouble with the police. He subsequently picked up the victim in Watkins’ car. The de[692]*692fendant testified that the victim asked him to move the gun from the front seat, and as he did so the gun accidentally discharged, striking the victim in the head. The defendant drove the victim to the hospital where she died from this injury four days later.
There was testimony from numerous witnesses that the defendant had frequently threatened to kill the victim. One witness testified that she had heard the defendant tell the victim he would “blow [her] brains out.” Other witnesses testified that the victim had stated she wished to discontinue her relationship with the defendant, but was afraid of him.
A firearms examiner from the State Crime Lab testified that the safety feature on the gun in question was working, and the gun would not discharge if dropped. This witness further testified that it would take a minimum of four pounds of pressure to pull the trigger on the gun. The witness gave his opinion that the gun would discharge only if the trigger were pulled.
There was also evidence that the defendant had worked as a security officer, and had been trained in the handling of firearms.
1. We conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of malice murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
2. The defendant argues that the trial court erred in charging that “malice shall be implied where no considerable provocation appears and where all the circumstances of the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart.” The defendant maintains that this charge shifted the state’s burden of proof to him, as well as denied him his sole defense of accident.
The defendant’s attacks on this charge, which tracks the language of OCGA § 16-5-1 (b), have been rejected in Baisden v. State, 258 Ga. 425 (369 SE2d 762) (1988); Flynn v. State, 255 Ga. 415 (2) (a) (339 SE2d 259) (1986); and McMichael v. State, 252 Ga. 305 (313 SE2d 693) (1984).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
410 S.E.2d 113, 261 Ga. 691, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gooden-v-state-ga-1991.