Gooden v. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n

Michigan Court of Appeals

Gooden v. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n

162 N.W.2d 147, 11 Mich. App. 695, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1363

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 24, 1968

DocketDocket 3,548

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 162 N.W.2d 147 (Gooden v. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gooden v. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n, 162 N.W.2d 147, 11 Mich. App. 695, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1363 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

• Per Curiam.

Plaintiff purchased a 1959 Dodge pick-up truck on an installment sales contract from Walters Motor Sales in Detroit, Michigan. As provided in the contract, Walters Motor Sales obtained from defendant herein a contract of insurance providing coverage from May 24, 1965 to May 24, 1966.

On February 19,1966, plaintiff’s 1959 Dodge pickup truck, while parked in front of his house, was struck and damaged by a hit-and-run driver. Plaintiff called his insurance company, defendant herein, on February 21, 1966, to report the loss, and was advised that his insurance had been previously can-celled. Two days later he received by mail, a cancellation and a partial return of his insurance premium.

An action in assumpsit was brought by plaintiff against defendant to recover damages in the amount of $316.99. Defendant denied liability contending that plaintiff’s insurance contract had been can-celled prior to plaintiff’s loss pursuant to CLS 1961, § 500.3020 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 24.13020), which provides for the cancellation of insurance policies.

In a written opinion the trial judge found the evidence established that defendant had mailed statutory notice of cancellation to plaintiff’s residence on June 22, 1965, but that plaintiff had not received the notice of cancellation. The trial court *697 further determined that CLS 1961, § 500.3020 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 24.13020) * requires actual receipt of notice of cancellation by the insured to effectuate cancellation of an insurance contract. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant. Defendant has appealed.

The issue of receipt was raised by competent evidence which rebuts the statutory presumption. After examining the record and authorities cited in the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the trial court’s determination was correct. Galkin v. Lincoln Mutual Cas Co. (1937), 279 Mich 327 and De Haan v. Marvin (1951), 331 Mich 231.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

T. G. Kavanagh, P. J., and Holbrook and Beer, JJ., concurred.

*

CLS 1961, § 500.3020 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 24.13020) provides in part as follows:

“The policy may be cancelled at any time by the insurer by mailing to the insured at his address last known to the insurer or its authorized agent * * * written notice of cancellation. * * * The mailing of notice as aforesaid shall be prima facie proof of notice. Delivery of such notice shall be equivalent to mailing.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

• Per Curiam.

Plaintiff purchased a 1959 Dodge pick-up truck on an installment sales contract from Walters Motor Sales in Detroit, Michigan. As provided in the contract, Walters Motor Sales obtained from defendant herein a contract of insurance providing coverage from May 24, 1965 to May 24, 1966.

On February 19,1966, plaintiff’s 1959 Dodge pickup truck, while parked in front of his house, was struck and damaged by a hit-and-run driver. Plaintiff called his insurance company, defendant herein, on February 21, 1966, to report the loss, and was advised that his insurance had been previously can-celled. Two days later he received by mail, a cancellation and a partial return of his insurance premium.

An action in assumpsit was brought by plaintiff against defendant to recover damages in the amount of $316.99. Defendant denied liability contending that plaintiff’s insurance contract had been can-celled prior to plaintiff’s loss pursuant to CLS 1961, § 500.3020 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 24.13020), which provides for the cancellation of insurance policies.

In a written opinion the trial judge found the evidence established that defendant had mailed statutory notice of cancellation to plaintiff’s residence on June 22, 1965, but that plaintiff had not received the notice of cancellation. The trial court *697 further determined that CLS 1961, § 500.3020 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 24.13020) * requires actual receipt of notice of cancellation by the insured to effectuate cancellation of an insurance contract. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant. Defendant has appealed.

The issue of receipt was raised by competent evidence which rebuts the statutory presumption. After examining the record and authorities cited in the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the trial court’s determination was correct. Galkin v. Lincoln Mutual Cas Co. (1937), 279 Mich 327 and De Haan v. Marvin (1951), 331 Mich 231.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

T. G. Kavanagh, P. J., and Holbrook and Beer, JJ., concurred.

*

CLS 1961, § 500.3020 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 24.13020) provides in part as follows:

“The policy may be cancelled at any time by the insurer by mailing to the insured at his address last known to the insurer or its authorized agent * * * written notice of cancellation. * * * The mailing of notice as aforesaid shall be prima facie proof of notice. Delivery of such notice shall be equivalent to mailing.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 N.W.2d 147, 11 Mich. App. 695, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gooden-v-camden-fire-ins-assn-michctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack