Goodell v. Stocks

152 A. 72, 112 Conn. 678, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 69
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 7, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 A. 72 (Goodell v. Stocks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodell v. Stocks, 152 A. 72, 112 Conn. 678, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 69 (Colo. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court set aside the verdict largely upon its lack 'of reliance upon the testimony of the *679 only eyewitness to the accident, due to the witness having made on a material point a statement shortly after the accident different from that testified to by her. It was for the jury, not the court, to pass upon the credibility of the witness' testimony. Further, the statement of the decedent to his wife at the hospital of what happened at the time of the accident, taken in connection with the physical facts and other undisputed facts in evidence, furnished a reasonable basis of fact upon which the jury might have reached their verdict. The motion to set aside the verdict should have been denied.

There is error, and the Superior Court is directed to enter judgment upon the verdict as rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Logan v. Jackson
78 A.2d 341 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 A. 72, 112 Conn. 678, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodell-v-stocks-conn-1930.