Goodell v. Provident Mut. Life Ins.

Sixth Circuit

Goodell v. Provident Mut. Life Ins.

129 F.2d 468, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3400

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 1, 1942

DocketNo. 9058

StatusPublished

This text of 129 F.2d 468 (Goodell v. Provident Mut. Life Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodell v. Provident Mut. Life Ins., 129 F.2d 468, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3400 (6th Cir. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;

And it appearing that the only contested issue was whether or not notice of foreclosure sale had been posted pursuant to Section 27.1223, Mich.Stat.Ann. (§ 14427, Comp.Laws 1929) upon the premises involved, and that an affidavit setting forth the time, manner and place of posting the copy of the notice had been executed and recorded as authorized by Sections 27.1235-27.1237, Mich. Stat.Ann. (§§ 14439-14441, Comp.Laws 1929);

And it appearing that the District Court found as a fact, upon substantial evidence, that a copy of the notice of the foreclosure sale was posted in a conspicuous place on the premises described and that this constituted a proper posting in accordance with Michigan statutes, and that no defect was shown in connection with the foreclosure proceedings:

It is ordered that the judgment and decree appealed from be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;

And it appearing that the only contested issue was whether or not notice of foreclosure sale had been posted pursuant to Section 27.1223, Mich.Stat.Ann. (§ 14427, Comp.Laws 1929) upon the premises involved, and that an affidavit setting forth the time, manner and place of posting the copy of the notice had been executed and recorded as authorized by Sections 27.1235-27.1237, Mich. Stat.Ann. (§§ 14439-14441, Comp.Laws 1929);

And it appearing that the District Court found as a fact, upon substantial evidence, that a copy of the notice of the foreclosure sale was posted in a conspicuous place on the premises described and that this constituted a proper posting in accordance with Michigan statutes, and that no defect was shown in connection with the foreclosure proceedings:

It is ordered that the judgment and decree appealed from be and it hereby is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 F.2d 468, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodell-v-provident-mut-life-ins-ca6-1942.