Goode v. Steele

69 P. 319, 8 Idaho 538, 1902 Ida. LEXIS 39
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedJune 12, 1902
StatusPublished

This text of 69 P. 319 (Goode v. Steele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goode v. Steele, 69 P. 319, 8 Idaho 538, 1902 Ida. LEXIS 39 (Idaho 1902).

Opinion

Per CUBIAM.

— It appears from the petition and exhibits thereto attached, and from the return of the defendant to the writ, that the defendant, as judge of the district court of the second judicial district, did, on the fifteenth day of May, 1902, without application therefor, and without notice to plaintiff, who had no opportunity whatever of presenting his defense, make an order disbarring the plaintiff from practicing law as an attorney in all the courts of this state. Said order is void, because the judge had no jurisdiction to make the same. Said order should be annulled, and it is therefore ordered by this court that the said order be, and the same hereby is, annulled. No costs to be taxed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 P. 319, 8 Idaho 538, 1902 Ida. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goode-v-steele-idaho-1902.