Goode v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Goode v. State

733 So. 2d 1082, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5805, 1999 WL 278613

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 7, 1999

DocketNo. 97-2598

StatusPublished

This text of 733 So. 2d 1082 (Goode v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goode v. State, 733 So. 2d 1082, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5805, 1999 WL 278613 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bryan Goode appeals from the judgments and sentences entered in four separate cases. We affirm his convictions but reverse and remand for resentencing because of various guideline scoresheet errors.

At sentencing, the trial court did not have the benefit of Dillard v. State, 728 So.2d 725 (Fla.1999), wherein the supreme court explained the procedures to be followed where, as here, two versions of the guidelines are involved. See also Quinn v. State, 692 So.2d 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (“[T]he trial court was required to receive two scoresheets and impose a guidelines sentence pursuant to each scoresheet.”).

Goode’s remaining points on appeal are either without merit or have not been preserved for review.

REVERSED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI