Goode v. Johnson

149 So. 736, 111 Fla. 765, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2095
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 5, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 736 (Goode v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goode v. Johnson, 149 So. 736, 111 Fla. 765, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2095 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since the judgment herein was rendered on the pleadings in the cause, the Federal Supreme Court in Nixon v. Condon, 286 U. S. 73, 52 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484, 76 L. Ed. 629 (See also White v. County Democratic Executive Committee, 60 Fed. [2nd] 973; West v. Bliley, 33 Fed. Rep. [2nd] 177; Bliley v. West, 42 Fed. Rep. [2nd] 101), has announced pertinent principles which had not theretofore been adjudicated by the controlling authority and which could not have been considered in rendering the judgment in this cause; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nixon v. Condon
286 U.S. 73 (Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 So. 736, 111 Fla. 765, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goode-v-johnson-fla-1933.