Goode v. Holcombe
This text of 37 Ala. 94 (Goode v. Holcombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
R. W. WALTER, J.
To authorize a final judgment against a garnishee, who has not answered, a judgment nisi must be first entered against-him, and then a scire facias issued thereupon, must be executed and returned j or two such notices must be returned “not found” by tbe sheriff of the county in which tbe garnishment was executed, Code, § 2545; Lowry v. Clements, 9 Ala. 422; Wood v. Russell, 22 Ala. 645; Dew v. Bank, 9 Ala. 323. In this case, tile garnishee- Goode did- not answer and, without rendering the conditional judgment, and issuing the scire facias required 'by tile statute,^ the court entered a final judgment against him. This was -erfatal ernm Judgment reversed, and cause remandedt
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 Ala. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goode-v-holcombe-ala-1860.