Goode v. . Chair Co.

162 S.E. 923, 202 N.C. 826, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 245
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 17, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 923 (Goode v. . Chair Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goode v. . Chair Co., 162 S.E. 923, 202 N.C. 826, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 245 (N.C. 1932).

Opinion

Civil action to recover on a promissory note made by Maiden Chair Company and endorsed by R. B. Killian and others, instituted 28 March, 1930, and judgment by default, for the want of an answer, entered 12 May, 1930.

Thereafter, on 29 June, 1931, R. B. Killian lodged a motion to vacate the judgment on the ground that "no prosecution bond was executed at the time of the purported summons issued." Motion overruled, and movant appeals. Affirmed on authority of Brittain v. Howell, 19 N.C. 107.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brittain v. . Howell
19 N.C. 107 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1836)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E. 923, 202 N.C. 826, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goode-v-chair-co-nc-1932.