Goode v. . Chair Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Goode v. . Chair Co.

162 S.E. 923, 202 N.C. 826, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 245

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 17, 1932·Published

Opinion

Civil action to recover on a promissory note made by Maiden Chair Company and endorsed by R. B. Killian and others, instituted 28 March, 1930, and judgment by default, for the want of an answer, entered 12 May, 1930.

Thereafter, on 29 June, 1931, R. B. Killian lodged a motion to vacate the judgment on the ground that "no prosecution bond was executed at the time of the purported summons issued." Motion overruled, and movant appeals. Affirmed on authority of Brittain v. Howell, 19 N.C. 107.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civil action to recover on a promissory note made by Maiden Chair Company and endorsed by R. B. Killian and others, instituted 28 March, 1930, and judgment by default, for the want of an answer, entered 12 May, 1930.

Thereafter, on 29 June, 1931, R. B. Killian lodged a motion to vacate the judgment on the ground that "no prosecution bond was executed at the time of the purported summons issued." Motion overruled, and movant appeals. Affirmed on authority of Brittain v. Howell, 19 N.C. 107.

Affirmed.

Goode v. . Chair Co., 162 S.E. 923, 202 N.C. 826, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 245 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

162 S.E. 923 (Goode v. . Chair Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related