Goode v. Chaffee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Goode v. Chaffee

150 P. 696, 50 Okla. 63, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 381

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 13, 1915

Docket4636

StatusPublished

This text of 150 P. 696 (Goode v. Chaffee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goode v. Chaffee, 150 P. 696, 50 Okla. 63, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 381 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

This case originated in the justice court of Garfield county. Upon appeal to the county court of said county demurrer to the first cause of action set forth in the bill of particulars was sustained; and, plaintiff electing to stand upon said cause of action as pleaded, the same was dismissed, and judgment rendered thereon for defendant. This action of the court is assigned as error. It would serve no useful purpose to set out the bill of particulars here. We have examined the same, and hold that the first cause of action therein set forth was well and sufficiently pleaded. The trial court committed prejudicial error in sustaining the demurrer.

The judgment should be reversed, and the cause remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

This case originated in the justice court of Garfield county. Upon appeal to the county court of said county demurrer to the first cause of action set forth in the bill of particulars was sustained; and, plaintiff electing to stand upon said cause of action as pleaded, the same was dismissed, and judgment rendered thereon for defendant. This action of the court is assigned as error. It would serve no useful purpose to set out the bill of particulars here. We have examined the same, and hold that the first cause of action therein set forth was well and sufficiently pleaded. The trial court committed prejudicial error in sustaining the demurrer.

The judgment should be reversed, and the cause remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 P. 696, 50 Okla. 63, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goode-v-chaffee-okla-1915.