Goode v. Bond

652 S.W.2d 98, 1983 Mo. LEXIS 372
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided May 27, 1983·No. No. 65035·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before us on appellants’ motion to expedite their appeal from the judgment of the trial court that the one-cent increase in sales tax, Proposition C, is not included in the calculation of total state revenues under Article X, § 18, Mo.Const.

Because the first sentence of the Hancock Amendment, Article X, § 16, excludes those increases in taxes receiving voter approval from the limitations contained in § 18, and Proposition C received such approval, we take judicial notice that there is no justicia-ble controversy between the parties and dismiss the appeal.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goode v. Bond, 652 S.W.2d 98, 1983 Mo. LEXIS 372 (Mo. 1983).

652 S.W.2d 98 (Goode v. Bond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Hunter
119 S.W.3d 95 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2003)
Missouri Merchants & Manufacturers Ass'n v. State
42 S.W.3d 628 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2001)
Conservation Federation of Missouri v. Hanson
994 S.W.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1999)
Kelly v. Hanson
984 S.W.2d 540 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)
Avanti Petroleum, Inc. v. St. Louis County
974 S.W.2d 506 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)
Keller v. Marion County Ambulance District
820 S.W.2d 301 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1991)
Opinion No. (1985)
Missouri Attorney General Reports, 1985
Dirck v. State
665 S.W.2d 615 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1984)